C. Jerold Singh rep by his power of attorney S. Madhavan vs S. Jeyanthi and 7 ors Advocate - Adv S.John Milton — 190/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040002712022
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
383/2022
Filing Date
22-09-2022
Registration No
190/2022
Registration Date
28-10-2022
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
7-I Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C. Jerold Singh rep by his power of attorney S. Madhavan
Adv. Adv V.Deva Prasanna
Respondent(s)
S. Jeyanthi and 7 ors Advocate - Adv S.John Milton
Christhudhas
The Secretary, Theroor Primary Agricultural Co operative Crediot society Ltd.,
The president Theroor Primary Agricultural Co Operative credit Society Ltd.,
The Co operative sub Registrar EOC
The Deputy Registrar of Co operative Societies
The Regional joint Registrar of Co operative Societies
The Registrar of Co operative Societies
Hearing History
Judge: 7-I Additional District Munsif
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 21-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 02-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 28-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 24-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the Co-operative authorities (petitioners/5 to 8 defendants) to set aside an ex parte order passed on 22.12.2022 has been allowed. Although the court found the petitioners' stated reason of "official work" for non-appearance was unsubstantiated by evidence, it allowed the petition in the interest of justice to permit filing of a written statement for complete judicial determination of the original suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the Co-operative authorities (petitioners/5 to 8 defendants) to set aside an ex parte order passed on 22.12.2022 has been allowed. Although the court found the petitioners' stated reason of "official work" for non-appearance was unsubstantiated by evidence, it allowed the petition in the interest of justice to permit filing of a written statement for complete judicial determination of the original suit. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts