S. Alfred Sathiyasekar vs The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Charitable Endowment, Tirunelveli and 2 ors Advocate - Government Pleader — 188/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040002392021
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
332/2021
Filing Date
02-09-2021
Registration No
188/2021
Registration Date
06-09-2021
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
7-I Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Alfred Sathiyasekar
Adv. Adv L.Rajathurai
Respondent(s)
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Charitable Endowment, Tirunelveli and 2 ors Advocate - Government Pleader
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Charitable Endowment, Tirunelveli
Adv. Government Pleader
The Executive Office, Arulmigu Subramoniasway Thirukovil, Thiruchendur
Adv. Adv R.Arumuga Perumal
Hearing History
Judge: 7-I Additional District Munsif
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 24-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Tamil civil suit (O.S. No. 188/2021) heard on 05.03.2025 at the Additional District Court, Nagercoil. The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding ownership rights to temple property and a building used as a medical clinic. The order records detailed testimony from the third defendant concerning property records, land registry documents, medical establishment registration, and competing claims of ownership under Hindu temple law. The matter involves disputes over property transfers, building tax receipts, and whether prior administrative orders validly established rights to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Tamil civil suit (O.S. No. 188/2021) heard on 05.03.2025 at the Additional District Court, Nagercoil. The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding ownership rights to temple property and a building used as a medical clinic. The order records detailed testimony from the third defendant concerning property records, land registry documents, medical establishment registration, and competing claims of ownership under Hindu temple law. The matter involves disputes over property transfers, building tax receipts, and whether prior administrative orders validly established rights to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts