Gunasekar vs Saraswathi Advocate - Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj — 101/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, order VII, Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040001832023
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
213/2023
Filing Date
14-06-2023
Registration No
101/2023
Registration Date
14-06-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gunasekar
Adv. Adv L.Rajathurai
Respondent(s)
Saraswathi Advocate - Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj
Ezhil Arasu
Adv. Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj
Kavi Arasu
Adv. Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Tamil language civil court order (O.S. No. 101/2023) from the Madurai District Court dated 17.03.2026. The document contains lengthy testimony and cross-examination of a witness regarding a property dispute concerning land survey number 376/11. The court's final order is not clearly stated in the provided excerpts, which consist primarily of witness examination regarding property boundaries, measurements, construction details, and competing claims to the disputed land. A definitive outcome (petition allowed/dismissed, judgment rendered) cannot be determined from these pages alone. Status: SKIP — While the document is readable, it is incomplete; the actual court order/outcome is not present in the provided pages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Tamil language civil court order (O.S. No. 101/2023) from the Madurai District Court dated 17.03.2026. The document contains lengthy testimony and cross-examination of a witness regarding a property dispute concerning land survey number 376/11. The court's final order is not clearly stated in the provided excerpts, which consist primarily of witness examination regarding property boundaries, measurements, construction details, and competing claims to the disputed land. A definitive outcome (petition allowed/dismissed, judgment rendered) cannot be determined from these pages alone. Status: SKIP — While the document is readable, it is incomplete; the actual court order/outcome is not present in the provided pages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts