Ramachandran vs Meena Advocate - Adv. Subramoniapillai — 79/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK040001522019

Arguments

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

211/2019

Filing Date

04-06-2019

Registration No

79/2019

Registration Date

04-06-2019

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

8-II Additional District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/9/2025 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section MeenaRamachandran
Ia/10/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section MeenaRamachandran
Ia/11/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section MeenaRamachandran

Petitioner(s)

Ramachandran

Adv. Adv H.Sthanu Subramony

Kannan

Thangam

Respondent(s)

Meena Advocate - Adv. Subramoniapillai

Muthuswamy

Adv. Adv. Subramoniapillai

Hearing History

Judge: 8-II Additional District Munsif

29-04-2026

Arguments

28-04-2026

Arguments

27-04-2026

Arguments

25-04-2026

Arguments

22-04-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

21-07-2023
Deposition
04-08-2023
Deposition
06-10-2023
Evidence
23-06-2025
Evidence
01-07-2025
Evidence
03-07-2025
Evidence
16-07-2025
Evidence
19-09-2025
Evidence
13-10-2025
Evidence
15-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The petition filed by defendants Meena and B. Muthuswamy under Section 62 of the Transfer of Property Act seeking permission to deposit Rs. 400/- (mortgage amount) in court was allowed. The court held that permitting the deposit of this small amount will not create new rights for the petitioners nor prejudice the respondents, and all substantive issues regarding legal heirship, mortgage validity, and redemption rights remain open for final determination during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed by defendants Meena and B. Muthuswamy under Section 62 of the Transfer of Property Act seeking permission to deposit Rs. 400/- (mortgage amount) in court was allowed. The court held that permitting the deposit of this small amount will not create new rights for the petitioners nor prejudice the respondents, and all substantive issues regarding legal heirship, mortgage validity, and redemption rights remain open for final determination during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case