Raja Jeyanthi vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by District Collector and 4 ors Advocate - Government Pleader — 90/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040001272022
Filing Number
212/2022
Filing Date
29-Apr-2022
Registration No
90/2022
Registration Date
29-Apr-2022
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
7-I Additional District Munsif
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raja Jeyanthi
Adv. Adv R.Shunmughanandha Karthees
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Tamilnadu Rep by District Collector and 4 ors Advocate - Government Pleader
-
2.The Executive Officer, The Kottaram Panchayat,
Adv. Government Pleader
-
3.Suresh Rajan
Adv. Adv M.S. Moorthy
-
4.Steephen
Adv. Adv M.S. Moorthy
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Judgement
I Additional District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2026
Arguments
I Additional District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2026
Arguments
I Additional District Munsif
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
I Additional District Munsif
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
I Additional District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
I Additional District Munsif
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
I Additional District Munsif
-
06-Mar-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
03-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In this First Additional Civil Court case (O.S No. 90/2022) dated 03.03.2026, the court examined a land encroachment dispute involving elevated land/basement construction affecting water drainage. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims that defendants (plots 3-5) illegally raised their land level, causing water logging in the plaintiff's property, finding insufficient evidence of wrongdoing and questioning the credibility of the plaintiff's testimony. The cross-examination of the plaintiff was completed, with the court noting contradictions in the plaintiff's statements and directing the case to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
19-Feb-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
17-Feb-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
04-Feb-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
24-Jan-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
02-Jan-2026
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
10-Dec-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
06-Dec-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
28-Nov-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
11-Nov-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
27-Oct-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
07-Oct-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
22-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
26-Aug-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
12-Aug-2025
Part Heard
I Additional District Munsif
-
04-Aug-2025
Orders
I Additional District Munsif
-
28-Jul-2025
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
26-Jun-2025
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
20-Jun-2025
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
11-Jun-2025
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
30-Apr-2025
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
I Additional District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Additional District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Additional District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Additional District Munsif
-
24-Feb-2025
Trial
I Additional District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2025
Trial
I Additional District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2025
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2025
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
18-Dec-2024
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2024
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2024
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
04-Oct-2024
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
09-Aug-2024
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
12-Jul-2024
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
15-Apr-2024
IA Pending
I Additional District Munsif
-
11-Mar-2024
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
04-Mar-2024
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
01-Mar-2024
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
03-Oct-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
12-Sep-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
08-Aug-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
30-Jun-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
28-Apr-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
20-Apr-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
05-Jan-2023
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
08-Dec-2022
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
05-Dec-2022
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2022
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
30-Sep-2022
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
01-Jul-2022
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
29-Jun-2022
Service Pending-Summon
I Additional District Munsif
-
01-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2022
Summary: In this First Additional Civil Court case (O.S No. 90/2022) dated 03.03.2026, the court examined a land encroachment dispute involving elevated land/basement construction affecting water drainage. The court rejected the plaintiff's claims that defendants (plots 3-5) illegally raised their land level, causing water logging in the plaintiff's property, finding insufficient evidence of wrongdoing and questioning the credibility of the plaintiff's testimony. The cross-examination of the plaintiff was completed, with the court noting contradictions in the plaintiff's statements and directing the case to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts