Bala Prajapathi and others vs The District Collector, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil Advocate - Adv.Santhosh Kumar.T. — 46/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040001032020
Filing Number
129/2020
Filing Date
14-03-2020
Registration No
46/2020
Registration Date
14-03-2020
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
8-II Additional District Munsif
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bala Prajapathi and others
Adv. Adv C. Ashok Kumar
P. Pyan Krishna Raj
P. Pyan Krishna Nama Mani
P. Pyan Chella Vadivoo
P. Pyan Namrish Chella
Respondent(s)
The District Collector, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil Advocate - Adv.Santhosh Kumar.T.
The Block Development Officer
Adv. Adv.Santhosh Kumar.T.
The President, Swamythoppu
Adv. Adv.Santhosh Kumar.T.
The Thashildhar, Kanniyakumari District.
Adv. Adv.Santhosh Kumar.T.
A. Shanthi Subbiah
Shweta Subbiah
Shivani Subbiash
Hearing History
Judge: 8-II Additional District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 28-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit, holding that they failed to establish their title and possession over the disputed properties, failed to properly identify the properties and retaining wall location, and did not prove fraud in the earlier decree. The judge found critical defects including non-joinder of necessary co-patta holders and lack of proper evidence to substantiate their claims regarding ownership of survey numbers 273/17 and 273/18 in North Thamaraikulam Village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit, holding that they failed to establish their title and possession over the disputed properties, failed to properly identify the properties and retaining wall location, and did not prove fraud in the earlier decree. The judge found critical defects including non-joinder of necessary co-patta holders and lack of proper evidence to substantiate their claims regarding ownership of survey numbers 273/17 and 273/18 in North Thamaraikulam Village. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts