Lakshmanan and another vs Antoni Picthai alias Moni died and 4 Ors. Advocate - Adv R.Pravin — 600078/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Batta. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNKK040001002012
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
600078/2012
Filing Date
24-11-2012
Registration No
600078/2012
Registration Date
24-11-2012
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
6-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmanan and another
Adv. Adv G.Sivakumar
Respondent(s)
Antoni Picthai alias Moni died and 4 Ors. Advocate - Adv R.Pravin
Addl.2. Chandra
Adv. Adv. Tr. H. Sthanusubramony
Sahayam
John Milton
Valarmathi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif
Batta
Additional Counter
EA Pending
EA Pending
EA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Batta |
| 16-04-2026 | Additional Counter |
| 15-04-2026 | EA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | EA Pending |
| 09-04-2026 | EA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary: The petition filed by John Milton to dismiss Execution Petition No. 78/2012 was dismissed. The court found that the execution petition, filed by Raja (who purchased the property from the original decree holder), was not barred by limitation due to the doctrine of merger—where a higher court's stay order absorbs lower court proceedings. The court also ruled that Milton lacked legal standing to challenge the execution, as he had no rights over the decreed property and admitted ignorance of its details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary: The petition filed by John Milton to dismiss Execution Petition No. 78/2012 was dismissed. The court found that the execution petition, filed by Raja (who purchased the property from the original decree holder), was not barred by limitation due to the doctrine of merger—where a higher court's stay order absorbs lower court proceedings. The court also ruled that Milton lacked legal standing to challenge the execution, as he had no rights over the decreed property and admitted ignorance of its details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts