Chandra vs Rajamohan and 2others Advocate - Adv T.Sri Ram — 600045/2018

Case under --- Section 26O7R1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK040000882018

IA Pending

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

600045/2018

Filing Date

07-03-2018

Registration No

600045/2018

Registration Date

07-03-2018

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

6-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

--- Section 26O7R1
Ia/7/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section Josephin and 5 othersChandra
Ia/8/2025 Classification : 5 of Limitation Act Section ChandraRajamohan and 2others
Ia/9/2025 Classification : Setaside Sale Petition Section ChandraRajamohan and 2others
Ia/10/2025 Classification : Others Section ChandraRajamohan and 2others
Ia/11/2025 Classification : Petition to Appoint Guardian Section ChandraRajamohan and 2others
Ia/12/2025 Classification : Impleading Petition Section ChandraRajamohan and 2others

Petitioner(s)

Chandra

Adv. Adv C.S.Suresh Babu

Respondent(s)

Rajamohan and 2others Advocate - Adv T.Sri Ram

Savarimuthu @ Ayya

Adv. Adv T.Sri Ram

Pitchammal

Adv. Adv T.Sri Ram

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Principal District Munsif

28-04-2026

IA Pending

20-04-2026

IA Pending

10-04-2026

IA Pending

01-04-2026

IA Pending

26-03-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

09-08-2023
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition filed by Chandra seeking to implead the 9th and 10th Respondents (Suman and Sujin, legal heirs of the deceased 2nd Defendant) as defendants in a property rights suit was allowed. The court held that since the suit concerns immovable property rights and the right to sue survives the death of a party, the legal representatives of the deceased defendant must be brought on record for proper adjudication. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Chandra seeking to implead the 9th and 10th Respondents (Suman and Sujin, legal heirs of the deceased 2nd Defendant) as defendants in a property rights suit was allowed. The court held that since the suit concerns immovable property rights and the right to sue survives the death of a party, the legal representatives of the deceased defendant must be brought on record for proper adjudication. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case