T. Sudalaiyandi Pillai vs S. krishna Pillai Advocate - Adv S.Vijaya Raghavan — 700208/2007
Case under Ia/3/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section S. krishna PillaiT. Sudalaiyandi Pillai. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNKK040000812007
Filing Number
700208/2007
Filing Date
16-04-2007
Registration No
700208/2007
Registration Date
16-04-2007
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
8-II Additional District Munsif
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. Sudalaiyandi Pillai
Adv. Adv K.S.Moni
Respondent(s)
S. krishna Pillai Advocate - Adv S.Vijaya Raghavan
K. Thanu Pillai
Adv. Adv S.Easwara Pillai
O. Iyyappan
Adv. Adv S.Easwara Pillai
S. Rajagopal
Adv. Adv S.Easwara Pillai
A. Chellappan
Adv. Adv S.Easwara Pillai
Hearing History
Judge: 8-II Additional District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The II Additional District Munsif Court in Nagercoil decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction, holding that he has established settled possession over the paddy field for over 35 years based on continuous rent receipts and tax payments. The court ruled that the plaintiff need not claim title to seek injunction relief and that even an unregistered assignment deed from 1968 corroborates his possession as tenant, thereby restraining defendants from forcibly evicting him from the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The II Additional District Munsif Court in Nagercoil decreed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction, holding that he has established settled possession over the paddy field for over 35 years based on continuous rent receipts and tax payments. The court ruled that the plaintiff need not claim title to seek injunction relief and that even an unregistered assignment deed from 1968 corroborates his possession as tenant, thereby restraining defendants from forcibly evicting him from the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts