Yesudhason vs Xavier Puspharaj and anr Advocate - Adv.T.R. Ezhamparithy, Adv. Ezhamparuthy — 32/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040000632020
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
78/2020
Filing Date
17-02-2020
Registration No
32/2020
Registration Date
17-02-2020
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
8-II Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yesudhason
Adv. Adv R.Rathakrishnan
Respondent(s)
Xavier Puspharaj and anr Advocate - Adv.T.R. Ezhamparithy, Adv. Ezhamparuthy
Yesu Mariya Selvaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 8-II Additional District Munsif
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 28-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 22-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 09-04-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. 32/2020 dated 27.01.2026, the Second Additional District Court in Nagercoil (Tamil Nadu) concluded the cross-examination and dismissed various contentions raised by the plaintiff, including claims regarding property rights and a 1/6 share. The court ruled against the plaintiff's arguments concerning property boundaries, compound walls, and the validity of a release deed, while also rejecting the plaintiff's entitlement to transfer the 1/6 share to another person. The cross-examination proceedings have been concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. 32/2020 dated 27.01.2026, the Second Additional District Court in Nagercoil (Tamil Nadu) concluded the cross-examination and dismissed various contentions raised by the plaintiff, including claims regarding property rights and a 1/6 share. The court ruled against the plaintiff's arguments concerning property boundaries, compound walls, and the validity of a release deed, while also rejecting the plaintiff's entitlement to transfer the 1/6 share to another person. The cross-examination proceedings have been concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts