Vadalivilai Pararai Arulmigu Illanerathu Mannarraja Temple vs Rajagobalan — 12/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK040000052025
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
10-Jan-2025
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
24-Jan-2025
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
8-II Additional District Munsif
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vadalivilai Pararai Arulmigu Illanerathu Mannarraja Temple
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajagobalan
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
21-Apr-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
15-Apr-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
02-Apr-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
11-Mar-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
03-Mar-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
18-Feb-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The II Additional District Munsif Court in Nagercoil allowed the temple's petition to amend its plaint in a permanent injunction suit. The court permitted the addition of a prayer seeking declaration of easementary right over the defendant's property, finding that the amendment was necessary to adjudicate the core dispute regarding pathway access and would not prejudice the defendant or alter the suit's nature. The petition was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
03-Feb-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
27-Jan-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
05-Jan-2026
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
19-Dec-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
11-Dec-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
26-Nov-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
19-Nov-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
07-Nov-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
04-Nov-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
28-Oct-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
23-Oct-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
13-Oct-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
07-Oct-2025
Trial
II Additional District Munsif
-
24-Sep-2025
Trial
II Additional District Munsif
-
18-Sep-2025
Trial
II Additional District Munsif
-
10-Sep-2025
Trial
II Additional District Munsif
-
26-Aug-2025
Trial
II Additional District Munsif
-
14-Aug-2025
Written Statement
II Additional District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2025
Written Statement
II Additional District Munsif
-
01-Aug-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
29-Jul-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
25-Jul-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
19-Jul-2025
IA Pending
II Additional District Munsif
-
14-Jul-2025
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
25-Jun-2025
Written Statement
I Additional District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2025
Issue of Service
I Additional District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2025
Issue of Service
I Additional District Munsif
-
24-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2025
Summary: The II Additional District Munsif Court in Nagercoil allowed the temple's petition to amend its plaint in a permanent injunction suit. The court permitted the addition of a prayer seeking declaration of easementary right over the defendant's property, finding that the amendment was necessary to adjudicate the core dispute regarding pathway access and would not prejudice the defendant or alter the suit's nature. The petition was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts