G.Subramanian vs T.Chidambaranathan Advocate - Adv S.Ramachandran — 329/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKK010088892022

Filing Number

1736/2022

Filing Date

06-Dec-2022

Registration No

329/2022

Registration Date

13-Dec-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Subramanian

    Adv. Adv P.Selvaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.Chidambaranathan Advocate - Adv S.Ramachandran

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  14. 22-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  15. 08-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  17. 04-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  19. 11-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  20. 04-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 329/2022) from the Principal District Judge, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil dated 04.07.2025, involving a mortgage deed dispute. The court examined witness D.W.1 (Sithambara Nathan) regarding a loan transaction of ₹12,00,000 with ₹3,00,000 interest, registered as ₹15,00,000 in the mortgage deed. The court found discrepancies in the defendant's testimony regarding the actual loan amount and interest paid, and rejected his claim that he owed ₹17,03,724. The court determined that based on evidence, the defendant owes ₹15,00,000 plus interest of ₹3,00,000 as stated in the mortgage deed, and the interest claim of ₹3,00,000 cannot be enforced as a lump sum penalty without clear documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  22. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  23. 11-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  25. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  26. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  27. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  28. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  29. 13-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  31. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  32. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  33. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  34. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  35. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  36. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  37. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  38. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  39. 27-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  40. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  41. 18-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  42. 28-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  43. 29-Jul-2024

    Restored

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  44. 29-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  45. 29-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  46. 07-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  47. 07-Sep-2023

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  48. 18-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  49. 05-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  50. 23-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  51. 20-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  52. 13-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 06-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 329/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 329/2022) from the Principal District Judge, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil dated 04.07.2025, involving a mortgage deed dispute. The court examined witness D.W.1 (Sithambara Nathan) regarding a loan transaction of ₹12,00,000 with ₹3,00,000 interest, registered as ₹15,00,000 in the mortgage deed. The court found discrepancies in the defendant's testimony regarding the actual loan amount and interest paid, and rejected his claim that he owed ₹17,03,724. The court determined that based on evidence, the defendant owes ₹15,00,000 plus interest of ₹3,00,000 as stated in the mortgage deed, and the interest claim of ₹3,00,000 cannot be enforced as a lump sum penalty without clear documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case