K Chellappan vs Sreetharan — 8/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415 (c). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNKK010069192025

e-Filing Number

29-12-2025

Filing Number

5734/2025

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415 (c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K Chellappan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sreetharan

  2. 2.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Public Prosecutor

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Fair JudgmentView PDF

    The Sessions Court at Nagercoil allowed the criminal appeal filed by K. Chellappan against his conviction, based on a joint memorandum of compromise filed by both parties. The appellant paid compensation to the respondent, and the court granted permission to compound the offense, thereby setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Nagercoil allowed the criminal appeal filed by K. Chellappan against his conviction, based on a joint memorandum of compromise filed by both parties. The appellant paid compensation to the respondent, and the court granted permission to compound the offense, thereby setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case