P.Mani Murugan vs Dr.S.R.Sreenivasa Kannan Advocate - G.Sivakumar — 4488/2025
Case under Limitationact Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010064662025
Filing Number
5370/2025
Filing Date
25-11-2025
Registration No
4488/2025
Registration Date
25-11-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Mani Murugan
Adv. Linus Raj Panneer Selvam
Respondent(s)
Dr.S.R.Sreenivasa Kannan Advocate - G.Sivakumar
Ramanikannan
Adv. G.Sivakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Service Pending-Notice
Service Pending-Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 11-03-2026 | Orders |
| 17-02-2026 | Service Pending-Notice |
| 06-01-2026 | Service Pending-Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge at Nagercoil allowed a petition to condone a 140-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment. The petitioner, an Assistant Inspector of Labour, explained that he initially mistook the case as filed under private complaint procedure and approached the High Court's Law Officer, but was later directed to file the appeal before the Sessions Court. Finding the explanation reasonable and uncontradicted by the respondents, the court granted the condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge at Nagercoil allowed a petition to condone a 140-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment. The petitioner, an Assistant Inspector of Labour, explained that he initially mistook the case as filed under private complaint procedure and approached the High Court's Law Officer, but was later directed to file the appeal before the Sessions Court. Finding the explanation reasonable and uncontradicted by the respondents, the court granted the condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts