P.Mani Murugan vs Dr.S.R.Sreenivasa Kannan Advocate - G.Sivakumar — 4488/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010064662025

Filing Number

5370/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

4488/2025

Registration Date

25-Nov-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.Mani Murugan

    Adv. Linus Raj Panneer Selvam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dr.S.R.Sreenivasa Kannan Advocate - G.Sivakumar

  2. 2.Ramanikannan

    Adv. G.Sivakumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge at Nagercoil allowed a petition to condone a 140-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment. The petitioner, an Assistant Inspector of Labour, explained that he initially mistook the case as filed under private complaint procedure and approached the High Court's Law Officer, but was later directed to file the appeal before the Sessions Court. Finding the explanation reasonable and uncontradicted by the respondents, the court granted the condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4488/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge at Nagercoil allowed a petition to condone a 140-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment. The petitioner, an Assistant Inspector of Labour, explained that he initially mistook the case as filed under private complaint procedure and approached the High Court's Law Officer, but was later directed to file the appeal before the Sessions Court. Finding the explanation reasonable and uncontradicted by the respondents, the court granted the condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case