P.Manimurugan vs Dr.S.R.Sreenivasa Kannan Advocate - G.Sivakumar — 4487/2025
Case under Limitationact Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010064652025
Filing Number
5369/2025
Filing Date
25-11-2025
Registration No
4487/2025
Registration Date
25-11-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Manimurugan
Adv. Linus Raj Panneer Selvam
Respondent(s)
Dr.S.R.Sreenivasa Kannan Advocate - G.Sivakumar
Ramani Kannan
Adv. G.Sivakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Service Pending-Notice
Service Pending-Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 11-03-2026 | Orders |
| 17-02-2026 | Service Pending-Notice |
| 06-01-2026 | Service Pending-Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge allowed the petitioner's petition to condone a 140-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that he initially mistakenly believed the case was filed under private complaint procedure and approached the High Court's Law Officer before being directed to file the appeal before the Sessions Court. Since the respondents did not contest the delay and the court found the reason credible, the petition was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge allowed the petitioner's petition to condone a 140-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation that he initially mistakenly believed the case was filed under private complaint procedure and approached the High Court's Law Officer before being directed to file the appeal before the Sessions Court. Since the respondents did not contest the delay and the court found the reason credible, the petition was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts