State of Tamilnadu Rep by District Collector vs Kottar Vagaiku Trusteekal Chithambaram Chettiyar — 96/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 77. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNKK010053952024

Filing Number

1000/2024

Filing Date

15-Oct-2024

Registration No

96/2024

Registration Date

16-Oct-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 77

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamilnadu Rep by District Collector

    Adv. Government Pleader

  2. 2.The DRM Office Cus

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kottar Vagaiku Trusteekal Chithambaram Chettiyar

  2. 2.Shankara Kumaru Chetiar

  3. 3.Rananujam Chettiyar

  4. 4.Kasinatha Mupanar

  5. 5.Shankara Narayana Chettiyar

  6. 6.Shankaralingam Chettiyar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court held that the current trustees of Kottar Chettu Nainar Desiga Vinayagar Devasthanam Trust are entitled to receive compensation of Rs. 65,16,923/- for land acquired by Southern Railways under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The court determined that since the property's patta stands in the trust's name and the current trustees were duly elected, they are the competent persons to alienate and claim compensation for the land, which must be deposited as a fixed deposit with interest credited to the trust's bank account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  16. 07-Aug-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  17. 11-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  18. 16-Jun-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  19. 15-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  20. 10-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  21. 30-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  22. 21-Dec-2024

    Reopen

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  23. 21-Dec-2024

    Restored

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  24. 21-Dec-2024

    Reopen

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  25. 16-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 15-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court held that the current trustees of Kottar Chettu Nainar Desiga Vinayagar Devasthanam Trust are entitled to receive compensation of Rs. 65,16,923/- for land acquired by Southern Railways under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The court determined that since the property's patta stands in the trust's name and the current trustees were duly elected, they are the competent persons to alienate and claim compensation for the land, which must be deposited as a fixed deposit with interest credited to the trust's bank account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case