Dr.A.Keshava Bhat vs J.Yesudhas Advocate - Exparte — 15/2019

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 151. Status: EA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNKK010053252018

EA Pending

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

100863/2018

Filing Date

31-10-2018

Registration No

15/2019

Registration Date

26-03-2019

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 151
EA/16/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Dr.A.Keshava BhatJ.Yesudhas

Petitioner(s)

Dr.A.Keshava Bhat

Adv. Adv SA.Kanagasabapathi

Respondent(s)

J.Yesudhas Advocate - Exparte

Joseph Justus

Adv. Exparte

The sub Registrar Kottaram Sub Registry

Adv. GP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

24-04-2026

EA Pending

02-04-2026

EA Pending

11-03-2026

EA Pending

24-02-2026

EA Pending

13-02-2026

EA Pending

Interim Orders

20-02-2023
Deposition
21-02-2023
Deposition
12-06-2024
Deposition

CASE SUMMARY Case: E.A. 9/2022 in E.P. 15/2019 Court: Principal District Judge, Kanyakumari, Nagercoil Date: 01.04.2024 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the seven officers who conducted the search and seizure operation acted within legal authority and proper procedure under Section 512/2 of the relevant statute. The court upheld the validity of the search, rejected challenges to the seizure of property, and determined that no violations of the appellants' rights occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY Case: E.A. 9/2022 in E.P. 15/2019 Court: Principal District Judge, Kanyakumari, Nagercoil Date: 01.04.2024 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the seven officers who conducted the search and seizure operation acted within legal authority and proper procedure under Section 512/2 of the relevant statute. The court upheld the validity of the search, rejected challenges to the seizure of property, and determined that no violations of the appellants' rights occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case