State of Tamil Nadu Vigilance and Anti Corruption vs S. Krishnan and 1 Other Advocate - A.Mahesh — 6/2025
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 13(1)(4). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case
CNR: TNKK010041452025
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
3445/2025
Filing Date
31-07-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
31-07-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
Vigilance and Anti corruption, Nagercoil
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Tamil Nadu Vigilance and Anti Corruption
Adv. SPL. P.P
Respondent(s)
S. Krishnan and 1 Other Advocate - A.Mahesh
Ravathy
Adv. A.Mahesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (dated 11.09.2025) in Special Session Case No. 6/2025 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil. Prosecution Witness D.W. 1 (a 63-year-old woman) testified regarding property sales, property divisions, vehicle ownership, housing loans, and insurance policies, providing documentary evidence through 13 exhibits. The witness challenged allegations of unexplained wealth made by anti-corruption authorities, asserting that her family's assets were legitimately acquired through ancestral property divisions and property sales. Cross-examination was adjourned for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (dated 11.09.2025) in Special Session Case No. 6/2025 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari at Nagercoil. Prosecution Witness D.W. 1 (a 63-year-old woman) testified regarding property sales, property divisions, vehicle ownership, housing loans, and insurance policies, providing documentary evidence through 13 exhibits. The witness challenged allegations of unexplained wealth made by anti-corruption authorities, asserting that her family's assets were legitimately acquired through ancestral property divisions and property sales. Cross-examination was adjourned for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts