Anto Navin vs Christy and 2 ors Advocate - Exparte — 113/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 26. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK010031222021
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
421/2021
Filing Date
27-04-2021
Registration No
113/2021
Registration Date
28-06-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anto Navin
Adv. Adv M.Timitilal
Respondent(s)
Christy and 2 ors Advocate - Exparte
Roselin Stella
Adv. Exparte
Benny Kingston
Adv. Exparte
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 02-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 11-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 27-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Principal District Judge allowed the petition filed by defendants Christy, Roselin Stella, and Benny Kingston to set aside the exparte order passed against them on 21.04.2022. The court found their reasons for not filing the written statement—health ailments of two senior citizen defendants and one defendant working abroad—believable and sufficient, and determined it was in the interest of justice to dispose of the suit on merits. However, the petition was allowed conditionally, requiring the defendants to pay Rs. 1,000 to the plaintiff by 04.06.2025, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. The case was called for hearing on 05.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District Judge allowed the petition filed by defendants Christy, Roselin Stella, and Benny Kingston to set aside the exparte order passed against them on 21.04.2022. The court found their reasons for not filing the written statement—health ailments of two senior citizen defendants and one defendant working abroad—believable and sufficient, and determined it was in the interest of justice to dispose of the suit on merits. However, the petition was allowed conditionally, requiring the defendants to pay Rs. 1,000 to the plaintiff by 04.06.2025, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. The case was called for hearing on 05.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts