Paul Suresh Kumar vs Sivabalakrishnan and 2 ors Advocate - Adv L.Rajathurai — 120/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKK010025562022
Filing Number
649/2022
Filing Date
30-Mar-2022
Registration No
120/2022
Registration Date
01-Apr-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Paul Suresh Kumar
Adv. Adv A.Vimalan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sivabalakrishnan and 2 ors Advocate - Adv L.Rajathurai
-
2.Karunakaran
Adv. Adv L.Rajathurai
-
3.Kurusami
Adv. Adv L.Rajathurai
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
The court examined the defendant (Temple Administrator) and found that the marriage was solemnized without proper documentary verification, including failure to obtain required certificates from the village administrator confirming it was the bride's first marriage. The court concluded that the defendant issued a false marriage certificate based on incomplete and unverified documents, thereby rejecting the defendant's contentions and holding them liable for damages to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Restored
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2022
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Aug-2022
Issues
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
07-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 120/2022
The court examined the defendant (Temple Administrator) and found that the marriage was solemnized without proper documentary verification, including failure to obtain required certificates from the village administrator confirming it was the bride's first marriage. The court concluded that the defendant issued a false marriage certificate based on incomplete and unverified documents, thereby rejecting the defendant's contentions and holding them liable for damages to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts