C Prahalathan vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Arumanai Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 834/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(l)(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010013022026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
1000/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
834/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
308
Police Station
Arumanai P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C Prahalathan
Adv. Sakunthala T
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Arumanai Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, allowed C. Prahalathan's petition to completely relax bail conditions imposed in a case involving offences under BNS sections 333, 296(b), and 103(1). The court found that the petitioner had consistently complied with the modified conditions (weekly police sign-ins) since February 2, 2026, and considering the nature of the alleged offences and his compliance duration, granted the relaxation to enable him to resume routine work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 834/2026
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, allowed C. Prahalathan's petition to completely relax bail conditions imposed in a case involving offences under BNS sections 333, 296(b), and 103(1). The court found that the petitioner had consistently complied with the modified conditions (weekly police sign-ins) since February 2, 2026, and considering the nature of the alleged offences and his compliance duration, granted the relaxation to enable him to resume routine work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts