Rafiya vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police Aralvaimozhi Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 837/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012922026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

993/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

837/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

776

Police Station

Aralvaimozhi P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rafiya

    Adv. THANU P G I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police Aralvaimozhi Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Rafiya, accused of theft under Section 303(2) BNS, balancing individual freedom with police investigational rights. The bail was conditional on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, surrendering for nine hours of police custody on March 14, 2026, daily police reporting, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction or tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 837/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Rafiya, accused of theft under Section 303(2) BNS, balancing individual freedom with police investigational rights. The bail was conditional on executing a Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, surrendering for nine hours of police custody on March 14, 2026, daily police reporting, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction or tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case