Kumar vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By SI of Police Anjugramam Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 796/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012772026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

980/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

796/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

ANJUGRAMAM P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kumar

    Adv. Adv S.Varatharajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By SI of Police Anjugramam Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Kumar (A2), the owner of a lorry seized with illegally transported sand (M.sand) without a transit pass under Section 303(2) BNS. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-interference with investigation, and restrictions on leaving jurisdiction, while permitting bail cancellation if conditions are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 796/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Kumar (A2), the owner of a lorry seized with illegally transported sand (M.sand) without a transit pass under Section 303(2) BNS. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-interference with investigation, and restrictions on leaving jurisdiction, while permitting bail cancellation if conditions are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case