Gilittausc vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Marthandam Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 818/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010012682026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
971/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
818/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
Marthandam P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gilittausc
Adv. Santhosh Kumar
Respondent(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Marthandam Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Gilittaus (A2) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and intimidating a woman and her family with an iron rod on 27.02.2026. The court favored the bail application considering the nature of offenses and that injured victims were discharged from hospital, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, twice-daily reporting to the Magistrate, and prohibiting witness tampering or leaving the jurisdictional police limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Gilittaus (A2) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and intimidating a woman and her family with an iron rod on 27.02.2026. The court favored the bail application considering the nature of offenses and that injured victims were discharged from hospital, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, twice-daily reporting to the Magistrate, and prohibiting witness tampering or leaving the jurisdictional police limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts