Gilittausc vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Marthandam Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 818/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012682026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

971/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

818/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

108

Police Station

Marthandam P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gilittausc

    Adv. Santhosh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Marthandam Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Gilittaus (A2) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and intimidating a woman and her family with an iron rod on 27.02.2026. The court favored the bail application considering the nature of offenses and that injured victims were discharged from hospital, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, twice-daily reporting to the Magistrate, and prohibiting witness tampering or leaving the jurisdictional police limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 818/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Gilittaus (A2) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), and 351(3) for allegedly assaulting and intimidating a woman and her family with an iron rod on 27.02.2026. The court favored the bail application considering the nature of offenses and that injured victims were discharged from hospital, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, twice-daily reporting to the Magistrate, and prohibiting witness tampering or leaving the jurisdictional police limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case