JP Jobin vs State of Tamilnadu rep by Inspector of Police Palugal P.S. Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 817/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012662026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

969/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

817/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

Palugal P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JP Jobin

    Adv. Santhosh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamilnadu rep by Inspector of Police Palugal P.S. Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed J.P. Jobin's second anticipatory bail petition, rejecting his claims of innocence in connection with the alleged trespass, property damage, and threats against Jose on 14.02.2026. The court found no change in circumstances since dismissing his first petition on 26.02.2026 and deemed custodial interrogation necessary given the serious nature of the offences under BNS Section 329(3) and the TNPPDL Act, alongside the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 817/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed J.P. Jobin's second anticipatory bail petition, rejecting his claims of innocence in connection with the alleged trespass, property damage, and threats against Jose on 14.02.2026. The court found no change in circumstances since dismissing his first petition on 26.02.2026 and deemed custodial interrogation necessary given the serious nature of the offences under BNS Section 329(3) and the TNPPDL Act, alongside the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case