Sudarmani vs State of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspr of Police Anjugramam Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 792/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012652026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

968/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

792/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

ANJUGRAMAM P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudarmani

    Adv. Adv S.Varatharajan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspr of Police Anjugramam Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Sudarmani, accused of illegally transporting 6 units of M-sand without a transit pass under BNS Section 303(2), after he spent 27 days in judicial custody. The court imposed conditions requiring him to execute a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and appear daily before police at 10:00 AM, while reserving the investigation officer's right to seek bail cancellation for any violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Sudarmani, accused of illegally transporting 6 units of M-sand without a transit pass under BNS Section 303(2), after he spent 27 days in judicial custody. The court imposed conditions requiring him to execute a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and appear daily before police at 10:00 AM, while reserving the investigation officer's right to seek bail cancellation for any violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case