Paulraj vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KOLLENCODE P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 794/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012632026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

966/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

794/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

KOLLENCODE P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Paulraj

    Adv. Adv J.Jabarlin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KOLLENCODE P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Paulraj, accused of assault and verbal abuse (BNS sections 296(b) and 118(1)) arising from a property dispute. Despite the prosecution's objection citing ongoing investigation, the court approved bail considering the complainant's hospital discharge. Bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, daily police reporting, court appearance within 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 794/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Paulraj, accused of assault and verbal abuse (BNS sections 296(b) and 118(1)) arising from a property dispute. Despite the prosecution's objection citing ongoing investigation, the court approved bail considering the complainant's hospital discharge. Bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, daily police reporting, court appearance within 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case