Edward Bright vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police vadasery Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 770/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012452026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

952/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

770/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

VADASERY P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Edward Bright

Adv. M Arthamanov

Ida Bel

Adv. M Arthamanov

Respondent(s)

State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police vadasery Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari dismissed two anticipatory bail petitions filed by seven accused persons charged with trespass, assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations serious—involving forced entry into the complainant's home, abuse, assault of the complainant and her husband, and theft of valuables worth ₹76 lakhs—and determined that granting bail at the preliminary investigation stage could obstruct the investigation and pose a threat to the complainant's safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari dismissed two anticipatory bail petitions filed by seven accused persons charged with trespass, assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations serious—involving forced entry into the complainant's home, abuse, assault of the complainant and her husband, and theft of valuables worth ₹76 lakhs—and determined that granting bail at the preliminary investigation stage could obstruct the investigation and pose a threat to the complainant's safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case