Edward Bright vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police vadasery Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 770/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010012452026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
952/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
770/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
VADASERY P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Edward Bright
Adv. M Arthamanov
Ida Bel
Adv. M Arthamanov
Respondent(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police vadasery Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari dismissed two anticipatory bail petitions filed by seven accused persons charged with trespass, assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations serious—involving forced entry into the complainant's home, abuse, assault of the complainant and her husband, and theft of valuables worth ₹76 lakhs—and determined that granting bail at the preliminary investigation stage could obstruct the investigation and pose a threat to the complainant's safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari dismissed two anticipatory bail petitions filed by seven accused persons charged with trespass, assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations serious—involving forced entry into the complainant's home, abuse, assault of the complainant and her husband, and theft of valuables worth ₹76 lakhs—and determined that granting bail at the preliminary investigation stage could obstruct the investigation and pose a threat to the complainant's safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts