Harish vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 828/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012302026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

938/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

828/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

PUTHUKADAI P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harish

    Adv. Madhankumar A

  2. 2.Bhranesh Pranesh

    Adv. Madhankumar A

  3. 3.Mahesh alias Magesh

    Adv. Madhankumar A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge modified the bail conditions imposed on three accused persons (Harish, Bhranesh, and Mahesh) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 132, 351(2), and TNPPDL Act section 3. The court relaxed the daily police reporting requirement to weekly appearances on Mondays at 10:00 A.M., considering the accused's consistent compliance record, the hardship caused to their livelihood, and the stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 828/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge modified the bail conditions imposed on three accused persons (Harish, Bhranesh, and Mahesh) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 132, 351(2), and TNPPDL Act section 3. The court relaxed the daily police reporting requirement to weekly appearances on Mondays at 10:00 A.M., considering the accused's consistent compliance record, the hardship caused to their livelihood, and the stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case