Mahesh alias Magesh vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 829/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012292026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

937/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

829/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

PUTHUKADAI P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh alias Magesh

    Adv. Madhankumar A

  2. 2.Mahesh Magesh

    Adv. Madhankumar A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, allowed the petition of Mahesh @ Magesh to condone his non-compliance with daily police reporting conditions on 01.03.2026, citing illness as the reason. The court found that the petitioner had generally complied with bail conditions imposed on 10.02.2026 for offences under BNS sections 296(b), 132, 351(2) and the TNPPDL Act, and exercised discretion to overlook the single instance of non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 829/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, allowed the petition of Mahesh @ Magesh to condone his non-compliance with daily police reporting conditions on 01.03.2026, citing illness as the reason. The court found that the petitioner had generally complied with bail conditions imposed on 10.02.2026 for offences under BNS sections 296(b), 132, 351(2) and the TNPPDL Act, and exercised discretion to overlook the single instance of non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case