Mahesh alias Magesh vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 829/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012292026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

937/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

829/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

PUTHUKADAI P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Mahesh alias Magesh

Adv. Madhankumar A

Mahesh Magesh

Adv. Madhankumar A

Respondent(s)

State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, allowed the petition of Mahesh @ Magesh to condone his non-compliance with daily police reporting conditions on 01.03.2026, citing illness as the reason. The court found that the petitioner had generally complied with bail conditions imposed on 10.02.2026 for offences under BNS sections 296(b), 132, 351(2) and the TNPPDL Act, and exercised discretion to overlook the single instance of non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District, allowed the petition of Mahesh @ Magesh to condone his non-compliance with daily police reporting conditions on 01.03.2026, citing illness as the reason. The court found that the petitioner had generally complied with bail conditions imposed on 10.02.2026 for offences under BNS sections 296(b), 132, 351(2) and the TNPPDL Act, and exercised discretion to overlook the single instance of non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case