Siva Rajan vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police ST kulam Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 812/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012282026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

936/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

812/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

209

Police Station

SOUTH THAMARAIKULAM P.S.,

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)
MINES & MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT & REGULATION) Act, 1957 Section 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

Siva Rajan

Adv. A. JEGAN LALL

Respondent(s)

State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police ST kulam Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District granted the petitioner Siva Rajan's request to completely relax the bail conditions imposed in a case involving alleged offences under Section 303(2) of BNS and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957. The court found that the petitioner had substantially complied with the modified weekly reporting condition since December 1, 2025 (with one absence due to illness on January 8, 2026), and considering the nature of the offences and duration of compliance, decided to remove all conditions entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District granted the petitioner Siva Rajan's request to completely relax the bail conditions imposed in a case involving alleged offences under Section 303(2) of BNS and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957. The court found that the petitioner had substantially complied with the modified weekly reporting condition since December 1, 2025 (with one absence due to illness on January 8, 2026), and considering the nature of the offences and duration of compliance, decided to remove all conditions entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case