Srinivasan vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police KANNIYAKUMARI Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 822/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483 (1)(b). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010012162026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
926/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
822/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
KANNIYAKUMARI P.S.,
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Srinivasan
Adv. PRASATH V
Respondent(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police KANNIYAKUMARI Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge modified the bail condition imposed on petitioner Srinivasan, who faced charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court accepted the petitioner's plea that he was receiving life threats from the counter-accused while complying with the original daily police reporting requirement at Kanyakumari. The court allowed the petition and modified the condition to require the petitioner to appear and sign before the Judicial Magistrate at Tenkasi instead, maintaining the 30-day period with a revised time of 10:30 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge modified the bail condition imposed on petitioner Srinivasan, who faced charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court accepted the petitioner's plea that he was receiving life threats from the counter-accused while complying with the original daily police reporting requirement at Kanyakumari. The court allowed the petition and modified the condition to require the petitioner to appear and sign before the Judicial Magistrate at Tenkasi instead, maintaining the 30-day period with a revised time of 10:30 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts