Srinivasan vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police KANNIYAKUMARI Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 822/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483 (1)(b). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010012162026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

926/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

822/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

KANNIYAKUMARI P.S.,

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483 (1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Srinivasan

    Adv. PRASATH V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police KANNIYAKUMARI Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge modified the bail condition imposed on petitioner Srinivasan, who faced charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court accepted the petitioner's plea that he was receiving life threats from the counter-accused while complying with the original daily police reporting requirement at Kanyakumari. The court allowed the petition and modified the condition to require the petitioner to appear and sign before the Judicial Magistrate at Tenkasi instead, maintaining the 30-day period with a revised time of 10:30 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 822/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge modified the bail condition imposed on petitioner Srinivasan, who faced charges under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court accepted the petitioner's plea that he was receiving life threats from the counter-accused while complying with the original daily police reporting requirement at Kanyakumari. The court allowed the petition and modified the condition to require the petitioner to appear and sign before the Judicial Magistrate at Tenkasi instead, maintaining the 30-day period with a revised time of 10:30 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case