Nagarajan vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police ST kulam Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 813/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010012152026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
925/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
813/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
209
Police Station
SOUTH THAMARAIKULAM P.S.,
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagarajan
Adv. A. JEGAN LALL
Respondent(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep by SI of Police ST kulam Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge at Kanniyakumari District allowed the petition of Nagarajan (accused in a case involving violations of BNS Section 303(2) and Mines and Minerals Act, 1957) and completely relaxed the bail condition requiring weekly police reporting. The court found that the petitioner had substantially complied with the weekly reporting requirement since December 1, 2025, with only one missed appearance due to illness on January 8, 2026, and considered the nature of offences and duration of compliance sufficient grounds for relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge at Kanniyakumari District allowed the petition of Nagarajan (accused in a case involving violations of BNS Section 303(2) and Mines and Minerals Act, 1957) and completely relaxed the bail condition requiring weekly police reporting. The court found that the petitioner had substantially complied with the weekly reporting requirement since December 1, 2025, with only one missed appearance due to illness on January 8, 2026, and considered the nature of offences and duration of compliance sufficient grounds for relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts