Manikandan vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 821/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010011792026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
894/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
821/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
449
Police Station
PUTHUKADAI P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manikandan
Adv. RCSUBRAMANI
Respondent(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petitioner's petition to relax bail conditions requiring daily police reporting at 10:00 A.M. Despite acknowledging the petitioner's excuse of caring for his pregnant wife, the court found that he had failed to comply regularly with the imposed conditions, with multiple non-compliance dates recorded by police. The court held that given the serious nature of the alleged offenses (BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 351(3), and Arms Act section 27), the bail condition would remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petitioner's petition to relax bail conditions requiring daily police reporting at 10:00 A.M. Despite acknowledging the petitioner's excuse of caring for his pregnant wife, the court found that he had failed to comply regularly with the imposed conditions, with multiple non-compliance dates recorded by police. The court held that given the serious nature of the alleged offenses (BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 351(3), and Arms Act section 27), the bail condition would remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts