Manikandan vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 820/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010011682026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
883/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
820/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
449
Police Station
PUTHUKADAI P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manikandan
Adv. RCSUBRAMANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking condonation of non-compliance with bail conditions requiring daily police sign-in at 10:00 A.M. The court found the petitioner's reason—caring for his pregnant wife—unacceptable and upheld the Public Prosecutor's objection, ruling that regular compliance with bail conditions is mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 820/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking condonation of non-compliance with bail conditions requiring daily police sign-in at 10:00 A.M. The court found the petitioner's reason—caring for his pregnant wife—unacceptable and upheld the Public Prosecutor's objection, ruling that regular compliance with bail conditions is mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts