P Mahadevi vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police ERAINEL P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 819/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010011592026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

877/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

819/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

549

Police Station

ERAINEL P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P Mahadevi

    Adv. M.Chenthil Kumar

  2. 2.A Pazhani

    Adv. M.Chenthil Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police ERAINEL P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District allowed the petition filed by P. Mahadevi and A. Pazhani and completely relaxed the bail conditions imposed on them. The court found that the petitioners had been consistently complying with the modified condition of weekly police appearance since January 12, 2026, and considering the nature of offences (under BNS sections 296(b), 329(4), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002) and their compliance record, the court decided to remove all reporting requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 819/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari District allowed the petition filed by P. Mahadevi and A. Pazhani and completely relaxed the bail conditions imposed on them. The court found that the petitioners had been consistently complying with the modified condition of weekly police appearance since January 12, 2026, and considering the nature of offences (under BNS sections 296(b), 329(4), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002) and their compliance record, the court decided to remove all reporting requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case