Rajasingh vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 717/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010011532026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
871/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
717/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
KARUNGAL P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajasingh
Adv. Paulraj A
Respondent(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police KARUNGAL P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 02-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Rajasingh (A2), the tempo owner accused of illegally transporting stones without proper permits under BNS Section 303(2) and the Mines and Minerals Act Section 21(4). The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, court appearance within 15 days, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction or tampering with witnesses, while allowing the investigating officer discretion to seek bail cancellation for any violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Rajasingh (A2), the tempo owner accused of illegally transporting stones without proper permits under BNS Section 303(2) and the Mines and Minerals Act Section 21(4). The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, court appearance within 15 days, and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction or tampering with witnesses, while allowing the investigating officer discretion to seek bail cancellation for any violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts