Pravin Raj vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 752/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010010622026

Filing Number

798/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

752/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

429

Police Station

PUTHUKADAI P.S

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pravin Raj

    Adv. S.J. Sajin Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police PUTHUKADAI P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Pravin Raj, accused in a 2018 fraud case (IPC Section 420), who had absconded and was arrested after a non-bailable warrant. Although the petitioner previously failed to appear and three bail applications were dismissed, the court approved bail considering his 57 days of incarceration and stated reasons for non-appearance, imposing strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and daily court appearance at 10:30 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 752/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Pravin Raj, accused in a 2018 fraud case (IPC Section 420), who had absconded and was arrested after a non-bailable warrant. Although the petitioner previously failed to appear and three bail applications were dismissed, the court approved bail considering his 57 days of incarceration and stated reasons for non-appearance, imposing strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and daily court appearance at 10:30 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case