Sujin vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Kaliyakkavilai P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 578/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010009062026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
685/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
578/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Kaliyakkavilai P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sujin
Adv. P Michael
Respondent(s)
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Kaliyakkavilai P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 27-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 25-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 18-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Sujin and S. Sunil Singh) in illegal red sand transportation cases under BNS Section 303(2) and the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957, with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting, and restrictions on leaving jurisdictional limits. The court found merit in granting bail considering the seized vehicle and pending confiscation petition, while imposing safeguards against witness tampering and investigation obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Sujin and S. Sunil Singh) in illegal red sand transportation cases under BNS Section 303(2) and the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957, with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting, and restrictions on leaving jurisdictional limits. The court found merit in granting bail considering the seized vehicle and pending confiscation petition, while imposing safeguards against witness tampering and investigation obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts