Sujin vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Kaliyakkavilai P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 578/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKK010009062026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
685/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
578/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Kaliyakkavilai P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sujin
Adv. P Michael
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police Kaliyakkavilai P.S Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Sujin and S. Sunil Singh) in illegal red sand transportation cases under BNS Section 303(2) and the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957, with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting, and restrictions on leaving jurisdictional limits. The court found merit in granting bail considering the seized vehicle and pending confiscation petition, while imposing safeguards against witness tampering and investigation obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 578/2026
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners (Sujin and S. Sunil Singh) in illegal red sand transportation cases under BNS Section 303(2) and the Mines and Minerals Act, 1957, with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, daily police reporting, and restrictions on leaving jurisdictional limits. The court found merit in granting bail considering the seized vehicle and pending confiscation petition, while imposing safeguards against witness tampering and investigation obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts