Amala Rajan vs J.M.Brilline Nisha Advocate - Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj — 413/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNKK010006272026

Filing Number

482/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

413/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amala Rajan

    Adv. S S Rejini Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J.M.Brilline Nisha Advocate - Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj

  2. 2.Gatlin Diobhila A B

    Adv. Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj

  3. 3.Piolin Daliya

    Adv. Adv M.Ashok Padmaraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge at Kanniyakumari allowed the petitioner's plea to condone a 2-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court accepted the petitioner's argument that the appeal was filed on 12.01.2026 within the stipulated time since 10-11 January 2026 were holidays, and found the delay neither willful nor wanton. Since the respondents did not dispute the claim and the delay was minimal, the court granted the condonation petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 413/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge at Kanniyakumari allowed the petitioner's plea to condone a 2-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court accepted the petitioner's argument that the appeal was filed on 12.01.2026 within the stipulated time since 10-11 January 2026 were holidays, and found the delay neither willful nor wanton. Since the respondents did not dispute the claim and the delay was minimal, the court granted the condonation petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case