Nagaraj vs Manjula — 74/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI160007232023

Filing Number

437/2023

Filing Date

06-Jul-2023

Registration No

74/2023

Registration Date

22-Dec-2023

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nagaraj

    Adv. SELVI.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manjula

  2. 2.The Manager, M/S Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    This is a motor vehicle accident case from Tamil Nadu. On October 5, 2022, Nagaraj was traveling on a Scooty with two others when a TVS Wego scooter rear-ended their vehicle, causing injuries to all three occupants. Nagaraj sustained injuries below the knee on his right leg and received treatment at government and private hospitals. During cross-examination on October 14, 2025, Nagaraj clarified inconsistencies in his earlier statements regarding who was driving, the purpose of travel, and helmet usage. The court recorded his testimony; no specific order granting or dismissing compensation is mentioned in this examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  16. 17-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  17. 23-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  18. 28-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  19. 31-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  20. 10-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  21. 02-Dec-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  22. 02-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  23. 17-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  26. 15-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  27. 14-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  28. 29-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  29. 15-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  30. 18-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  31. 20-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  32. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 06-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is a motor vehicle accident case from Tamil Nadu. On October 5, 2022, Nagaraj was traveling on a Scooty with two others when a TVS Wego scooter rear-ended their vehicle, causing injuries to all three occupants. Nagaraj sustained injuries below the knee on his right leg and received treatment at government and private hospitals. During cross-examination on October 14, 2025, Nagaraj clarified inconsistencies in his earlier statements regarding who was driving, the purpose of travel, and helmet usage. The court recorded his testimony; no specific order granting or dismissing compensation is mentioned in this examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case