Nagaraj vs Manjula — 74/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI160007232023

Arguments

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

437/2023

Filing Date

06-07-2023

Registration No

74/2023

Registration Date

22-12-2023

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Nagaraj

Adv. SELVI.K

Respondent(s)

Manjula

The Manager, M/S Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

02-04-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

14-10-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a motor vehicle accident case from Tamil Nadu. On October 5, 2022, Nagaraj was traveling on a Scooty with two others when a TVS Wego scooter rear-ended their vehicle, causing injuries to all three occupants. Nagaraj sustained injuries below the knee on his right leg and received treatment at government and private hospitals. During cross-examination on October 14, 2025, Nagaraj clarified inconsistencies in his earlier statements regarding who was driving, the purpose of travel, and helmet usage. The court recorded his testimony; no specific order granting or dismissing compensation is mentioned in this examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a motor vehicle accident case from Tamil Nadu. On October 5, 2022, Nagaraj was traveling on a Scooty with two others when a TVS Wego scooter rear-ended their vehicle, causing injuries to all three occupants. Nagaraj sustained injuries below the knee on his right leg and received treatment at government and private hospitals. During cross-examination on October 14, 2025, Nagaraj clarified inconsistencies in his earlier statements regarding who was driving, the purpose of travel, and helmet usage. The court recorded his testimony; no specific order granting or dismissing compensation is mentioned in this examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case