Nagaraj vs Manjula — 74/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI160007232023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
437/2023
Filing Date
06-07-2023
Registration No
74/2023
Registration Date
22-12-2023
Court
Sub Court, Denkanikottai
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagaraj
Adv. SELVI.K
Respondent(s)
Manjula
The Manager, M/S Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a motor vehicle accident case from Tamil Nadu. On October 5, 2022, Nagaraj was traveling on a Scooty with two others when a TVS Wego scooter rear-ended their vehicle, causing injuries to all three occupants. Nagaraj sustained injuries below the knee on his right leg and received treatment at government and private hospitals. During cross-examination on October 14, 2025, Nagaraj clarified inconsistencies in his earlier statements regarding who was driving, the purpose of travel, and helmet usage. The court recorded his testimony; no specific order granting or dismissing compensation is mentioned in this examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a motor vehicle accident case from Tamil Nadu. On October 5, 2022, Nagaraj was traveling on a Scooty with two others when a TVS Wego scooter rear-ended their vehicle, causing injuries to all three occupants. Nagaraj sustained injuries below the knee on his right leg and received treatment at government and private hospitals. During cross-examination on October 14, 2025, Nagaraj clarified inconsistencies in his earlier statements regarding who was driving, the purpose of travel, and helmet usage. The court recorded his testimony; no specific order granting or dismissing compensation is mentioned in this examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts