Sivagami vs Mr. N.Janakiraman — 66/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Orders Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI160007102023

Filing Number

433/2023

Filing Date

05-Jul-2023

Registration No

66/2023

Registration Date

22-Dec-2023

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sivagami

    Adv. VENKATESH KUMAR.R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mr. N.Janakiraman

  2. 2.Mr. P. perumal

  3. 3.M/S Magma General insurance company Limited

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: In MCOP 66/2023 before the Sub Judge, Denkanikottai, the court recorded the deposition of witness R. Premkumar (RW2 for respondent) on 16.04.2026 regarding a motor vehicle accident involving vehicle TN 29 AH 3886 that occurred in 2021. The witness, an employee of Magma General Insurance Company, testified that the petitioner (Sivagami) was a third-party passenger in the three-wheeler auto involved in the accident. The court's order indicated that the insurance company should settle compensation to the petitioners and recover the amount from the vehicle owner (second respondent). No cross-examination was noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  12. 23-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  15. 28-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  16. 21-Aug-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  19. 30-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  20. 09-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  21. 04-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  22. 14-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  23. 24-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  25. 07-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  26. 05-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  27. 04-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  28. 02-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  29. 07-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  30. 19-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  31. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 05-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In MCOP 66/2023 before the Sub Judge, Denkanikottai, the court recorded the deposition of witness R. Premkumar (RW2 for respondent) on 16.04.2026 regarding a motor vehicle accident involving vehicle TN 29 AH 3886 that occurred in 2021. The witness, an employee of Magma General Insurance Company, testified that the petitioner (Sivagami) was a third-party passenger in the three-wheeler auto involved in the accident. The court's order indicated that the insurance company should settle compensation to the petitioners and recover the amount from the vehicle owner (second respondent). No cross-examination was noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case