Mr. L. Raghu vs M. Mani — 49/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI160006102023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
383/2023
Filing Date
22-02-2023
Registration No
49/2023
Registration Date
22-12-2023
Court
Sub Court, Denkanikottai
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mr. L. Raghu
Adv. SWETHA B R
Respondent(s)
M. Mani
M.Kumar
United India Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP 49/2023 This is a cross-examination proceeding in a motor accident case. Petitioner Mr. L. Raghu was injured in a road accident on 04.07.2022 involving a two-wheeler (TN70 A 5104) when struck by a truck near Hosur. The case involves respondents M. Mani, M. Kumar, and United India Insurance Company Limited. During cross-examination on 18.09.2025, the petitioner admitted various contentions including delayed FIR (filed 16 days after accident), failure to produce hospital/medical documents, absence of driver's license documentation, and that injuries were caused partly due to his own negligence. The court concluded the cross-examination with no further examination noted, indicating the evidentiary phase proceeded as scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP 49/2023 This is a cross-examination proceeding in a motor accident case. Petitioner Mr. L. Raghu was injured in a road accident on 04.07.2022 involving a two-wheeler (TN70 A 5104) when struck by a truck near Hosur. The case involves respondents M. Mani, M. Kumar, and United India Insurance Company Limited. During cross-examination on 18.09.2025, the petitioner admitted various contentions including delayed FIR (filed 16 days after accident), failure to produce hospital/medical documents, absence of driver's license documentation, and that injuries were caused partly due to his own negligence. The court concluded the cross-examination with no further examination noted, indicating the evidentiary phase proceeded as scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts