S.Munjunath vs S.Prakash — 19/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI160005842023

Filing Number

369/2023

Filing Date

25-Jan-2022

Registration No

19/2023

Registration Date

22-Dec-2023

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Munjunath

    Adv. KADRESAN M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.Prakash

  2. 2.The Branch Manager Cholamandalam Ms. General Insurance Co., Ltd., Hosur

  3. 3.S.Venkatesan

  4. 4.The magnager, ShriRam Generala Insurance Co., Ltd.,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  11. 03-Jul-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  12. 06-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  13. 11-Mar-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  14. 27-Jan-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  15. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  16. 05-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  17. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  18. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  19. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  20. 05-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  21. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: S. Munjunath v. S. Prakash and Others (19/2023) The petitioner S. Munjunath sought compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident near Hosur, claiming he lost a leg requiring permanent medical treatment. The court found the petitioner lacked a valid driving license at the time of the accident and that he failed to produce documentary evidence of his medical expenses, with discrepancies between claimed amounts (₹3,40,404) and actual payments (₹2,64,000). The court dismissed the petition against respondents 1 and 2 (first respondent's vehicle owner and insurer) as they were non-parties to the accident, and dismissed claims against respondent 3 (the actual driver) due to the petitioner's lack of proper licensing and insufficient substantiation of damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 27-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  24. 22-Mar-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  25. 22-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  26. 26-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  27. 05-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

  28. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 25-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S. Munjunath v. S. Prakash and Others (19/2023) The petitioner S. Munjunath sought compensation for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident near Hosur, claiming he lost a leg requiring permanent medical treatment. The court found the petitioner lacked a valid driving license at the time of the accident and that he failed to produce documentary evidence of his medical expenses, with discrepancies between claimed amounts (₹3,40,404) and actual payments (₹2,64,000). The court dismissed the petition against respondents 1 and 2 (first respondent's vehicle owner and insurer) as they were non-parties to the accident, and dismissed claims against respondent 3 (the actual driver) due to the petitioner's lack of proper licensing and insufficient substantiation of damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case