minor c jothikirshna nfg father chinnasami vs Ellappan — 37/2024

Case under Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 Section 3 1. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI160004212024

Enquiry

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-12-2024

Filing Number

411/2024

Filing Date

20-12-2024

Registration No

37/2024

Registration Date

20-12-2024

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Acts & Sections

TAMIL NADU MOTOR VEHICLE RULES 1989 Section 3 1

Petitioner(s)

minor c jothikirshna nfg father chinnasami

Adv. Venkateshkumar R

Respondent(s)

Ellappan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

16-04-2026

Enquiry

12-03-2026

Enquiry

05-02-2026

Enquiry

18-12-2025

Enquiry

06-11-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

17-07-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: MCOP.37/2024 Case Type: Motor vehicle accident compensation case Parties: Minor C Jothikirshna (through father Chinnasami) v. Ellappan Outcome: The court dismissed the petition while holding that the second respondent's insurance company is liable to pay compensation. The court found that the petitioner-driver was operating the two-wheeler with only a Learner's License (LLR) and carried a passenger (Rajesh) without a valid driving license, violating Motor Vehicle Act provisions. While acknowledging injuries sustained, the court directed compensation to be reduced due to the petitioner's contributory negligence in operating the vehicle with insufficient qualifications. Cross-examination of both respondents was completed on 17.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCOP.37/2024 Case Type: Motor vehicle accident compensation case Parties: Minor C Jothikirshna (through father Chinnasami) v. Ellappan Outcome: The court dismissed the petition while holding that the second respondent's insurance company is liable to pay compensation. The court found that the petitioner-driver was operating the two-wheeler with only a Learner's License (LLR) and carried a passenger (Rajesh) without a valid driving license, violating Motor Vehicle Act provisions. While acknowledging injuries sustained, the court directed compensation to be reduced due to the petitioner's contributory negligence in operating the vehicle with insufficient qualifications. Cross-examination of both respondents was completed on 17.07.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case