C.MANJUNATHA REDDY vs R.MURALI KRISHNA REDDY — 149/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OVII R 1TO6. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKI160002772025

Part Heard

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

293/2025

Filing Date

21-07-2025

Registration No

149/2025

Registration Date

24-07-2025

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OVII R 1TO6

Petitioner(s)

C.MANJUNATHA REDDY

Adv. SELVASEKAR M

Respondent(s)

R.MURALI KRISHNA REDDY

M.SANTHIYA

M.NANAMBIGAI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

12-03-2026

Part Heard

11-02-2026

Part Heard

20-01-2026

Ex-Parte Evidence

01-12-2025

Ex-Parte Evidence

13-10-2025

Ex-Parte Evidence

Interim Orders

20-01-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: O.S.No.149/2025 The Sub Judge Court in Denkanikottai recorded the deposition of PW1 (Manjunatha Reddy, the plaintiff) on 20.01.2026 under oath in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1975. The plaintiff testified in support of his case and submitted five exhibits including a bank release deed (06.12.2009), a TDS certificate (07.10.2011), a sale agreement (18.06.2025), a legal notice (11.07.2025), and postal receipts. Since the defendants were directed to appear as defaulters, no cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded to render judgment based on the plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.No.149/2025 The Sub Judge Court in Denkanikottai recorded the deposition of PW1 (Manjunatha Reddy, the plaintiff) on 20.01.2026 under oath in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1975. The plaintiff testified in support of his case and submitted five exhibits including a bank release deed (06.12.2009), a TDS certificate (07.10.2011), a sale agreement (18.06.2025), a legal notice (11.07.2025), and postal receipts. Since the defendants were directed to appear as defaulters, no cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded to render judgment based on the plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case