C.MANJUNATHA REDDY vs R.MURALI KRISHNA REDDY — 149/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OVII R 1TO6. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI160002772025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
293/2025
Filing Date
21-07-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
24-07-2025
Court
Sub Court, Denkanikottai
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.MANJUNATHA REDDY
Adv. SELVASEKAR M
Respondent(s)
R.MURALI KRISHNA REDDY
M.SANTHIYA
M.NANAMBIGAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
Part Heard
Part Heard
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 20-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 01-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 13-10-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No.149/2025 The Sub Judge Court in Denkanikottai recorded the deposition of PW1 (Manjunatha Reddy, the plaintiff) on 20.01.2026 under oath in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1975. The plaintiff testified in support of his case and submitted five exhibits including a bank release deed (06.12.2009), a TDS certificate (07.10.2011), a sale agreement (18.06.2025), a legal notice (11.07.2025), and postal receipts. Since the defendants were directed to appear as defaulters, no cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded to render judgment based on the plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.No.149/2025 The Sub Judge Court in Denkanikottai recorded the deposition of PW1 (Manjunatha Reddy, the plaintiff) on 20.01.2026 under oath in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1975. The plaintiff testified in support of his case and submitted five exhibits including a bank release deed (06.12.2009), a TDS certificate (07.10.2011), a sale agreement (18.06.2025), a legal notice (11.07.2025), and postal receipts. Since the defendants were directed to appear as defaulters, no cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded to render judgment based on the plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts