INSPECTOR OF POLICE vs DHIVYA — 131/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 397, 395, 120B, 442, 347. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKI160002192023

Appearance

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

59/2023

Filing Date

21-04-2023

Registration No

131/2023

Registration Date

27-04-2023

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

KELAMANGALAM POLICE STATION

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 397, 395, 120B, 442, 347
MP/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Petitioner(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DHIVYA

RAJA

MAJUNATH

ANTHONY

VENKATESH

MADHUKUMAR

PREMKUMAR(BULLET)

ANSAR BASHA(RAKESH)

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

09-04-2026

Appearance

17-03-2026

Appearance

12-03-2026

Appearance

05-03-2026

Appearance

20-02-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

24-10-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This document is a witness deposition record in SC. No. 131/2023 (Crime No. 134/2021) before the Sub Court, Denkanikottai. The prosecution witness (LW12/PW6/Madesh) testified on 24.10.2025 regarding a theft case, providing evidence about confessional statements and seizure documents. The court found the witness's testimony to be false/unreliable and permitted cross-examination by the prosecution. No cross-examination was conducted by accused persons 1-5, 7, and 8. The case remains at the witness examination stage with further proceedings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record in SC. No. 131/2023 (Crime No. 134/2021) before the Sub Court, Denkanikottai. The prosecution witness (LW12/PW6/Madesh) testified on 24.10.2025 regarding a theft case, providing evidence about confessional statements and seizure documents. The court found the witness's testimony to be false/unreliable and permitted cross-examination by the prosecution. No cross-examination was conducted by accused persons 1-5, 7, and 8. The case remains at the witness examination stage with further proceedings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case