Muthuvediyamma vs K. Ramesh Kumar — 18/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI160001932024

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

177/2024

Filing Date

24-08-2023

Registration No

18/2024

Registration Date

16-07-2024

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Muthuvediyamma

Adv. MANOHARAN.G

Respondent(s)

K. Ramesh Kumar

The Branch Manager, Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

16-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

26-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

23-02-2026

Arguments

27-01-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

The court recorded the deposition of witness Soundrapandiyan (RW2 for respondent Magma HDI General Insurance Company) on 22.01.2026. The witness testified that the vehicle's insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident and that the third party was a passenger in the first respondent's vehicle. The petitioner's plea to dismiss the case against the second respondent (insurance company) was rejected, as the insurance policy was in force during the accident, making the insurer liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court recorded the deposition of witness Soundrapandiyan (RW2 for respondent Magma HDI General Insurance Company) on 22.01.2026. The witness testified that the vehicle's insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident and that the third party was a passenger in the first respondent's vehicle. The petitioner's plea to dismiss the case against the second respondent (insurance company) was rejected, as the insurance policy was in force during the accident, making the insurer liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case