Muthuvediyamma vs K. Ramesh Kumar — 18/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI160001932024
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
177/2024
Filing Date
24-08-2023
Registration No
18/2024
Registration Date
16-07-2024
Court
Sub Court, Denkanikottai
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muthuvediyamma
Adv. MANOHARAN.G
Respondent(s)
K. Ramesh Kumar
The Branch Manager, Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
The court recorded the deposition of witness Soundrapandiyan (RW2 for respondent Magma HDI General Insurance Company) on 22.01.2026. The witness testified that the vehicle's insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident and that the third party was a passenger in the first respondent's vehicle. The petitioner's plea to dismiss the case against the second respondent (insurance company) was rejected, as the insurance policy was in force during the accident, making the insurer liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court recorded the deposition of witness Soundrapandiyan (RW2 for respondent Magma HDI General Insurance Company) on 22.01.2026. The witness testified that the vehicle's insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident and that the third party was a passenger in the first respondent's vehicle. The petitioner's plea to dismiss the case against the second respondent (insurance company) was rejected, as the insurance policy was in force during the accident, making the insurer liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts