MAHESHWAR vs JEKAB R — 4/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,24(3). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI160001112025

Part Heard

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2025

Filing Number

123/2025

Filing Date

29-04-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

29-04-2025

Court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai

Judge

3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166,24(3)
CodeofCivilProcedure Section UNDER6RULE14(A),151

Petitioner(s)

MAHESHWAR

Adv. GANESAN R

Respondent(s)

JEKAB R

THE MANAGER OF ZUNO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Subordinate Judge, Denkanikottai

24-04-2026

Part Heard

09-04-2026

Part Heard

12-03-2026

Part Heard

12-02-2026

Arguments

05-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

24-07-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: MCOP.No.4/2025 On 24.07.2025, the Sub Judge, Denkanikottai recorded the deposition of Maheshwar (PW1/Petitioner) in this motor vehicle accident compensation case involving respondents Jekab R and Zuno General Insurance Company Limited. The petitioner presented 17 exhibits including FIR, hospital records, wound certificate, discharge summaries (medical bills totaling Rs.33,01,753), insurance policy, vehicle documents, and driving licenses to establish his claims. The respondents were declared absent, so no cross-examination occurred. The court accepted the petitioner's evidence and exhibits as per the testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCOP.No.4/2025 On 24.07.2025, the Sub Judge, Denkanikottai recorded the deposition of Maheshwar (PW1/Petitioner) in this motor vehicle accident compensation case involving respondents Jekab R and Zuno General Insurance Company Limited. The petitioner presented 17 exhibits including FIR, hospital records, wound certificate, discharge summaries (medical bills totaling Rs.33,01,753), insurance policy, vehicle documents, and driving licenses to establish his claims. The respondents were declared absent, so no cross-examination occurred. The court accepted the petitioner's evidence and exhibits as per the testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Denkanikottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case