Govindan vs Jadaiyan Advocate - K.Murugan — 100066/2016
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b),27(c),27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNKI130007982016
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
1000643/2016
Filing Date
16-08-2016
Registration No
100066/2016
Registration Date
16-08-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govindan
Adv. S.Moorthi
Ganesan
Adv. S.Moorthi
Subramani
Adv. S.Moorthi
Respondent(s)
Jadaiyan Advocate - K.Murugan
Thirupathi
Adv. K.Murugan
Suruttaiya Gounder
Adv. K.Murugan
Rani
Adv. K.Murugan
Lakshmi
Adv. K.Murugan
Kuppu
Adv. K.Murugan
Jaya
Adv. K.Murugan
Parvathi
Adv. K.Murugan
Lingammal
Adv. K.Murugan
Gudiyappan
Adv. K.Murugan
Osarayan
Adv. K.Murugan
Murugan
Adv. K.Murugan
Ramakkal
Adv. K.Murugan
Lingammal
Adv. K.Murugan
Suresh
Adv. K.Murugan
Veerapathiran
Adv. K.Murugan
Boopathi
Adv. K.Murugan
Rajesh
Adv. K.Murugan
Damodiran
Adv. K.Murugan
Sakthi
Adv. K.Murugan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 28-04-2026 | Steps |
| 21-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-04-2026 | Steps |
| 09-04-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100066/2016 (I.A.No. 205 of 2016) The District Munsif Court at Uthangarai accepted the commissioner's inspection report of the disputed property filed on 06.03.2017, which had been previously ordered on 16.08.2016. The court took the report on record as part of the case file, noting that both petitioners and respondents had not objected to it. The court clarified that while the commissioner's report serves as clarifying material for evidence, it is not substantial proof itself—parties may independently prove or disprove facts through witness examination or other evidence. The interlocutory application was accordingly closed on 08.04.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100066/2016 (I.A.No. 205 of 2016) The District Munsif Court at Uthangarai accepted the commissioner's inspection report of the disputed property filed on 06.03.2017, which had been previously ordered on 16.08.2016. The court took the report on record as part of the case file, noting that both petitioners and respondents had not objected to it. The court clarified that while the commissioner's report serves as clarifying material for evidence, it is not substantial proof itself—parties may independently prove or disprove facts through witness examination or other evidence. The interlocutory application was accordingly closed on 08.04.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts